I laugh at the commentary hella more than I ever did with Jon Stewart. But his interview chops are terrible.
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Fleet ghosting, or an American war on China? | Main | Homeowner’s Bill of Rights to Preempt State and Local Zoning Laws »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
I guess. His commentary on the current election cycle seems so bloodless and neutral in contrast to Stewart, who kept protesting that he wasn't political, when he clearly was. His comments on the SOTU were personal, but just weird (Obama as dictator for life)
I also think that Stewart was a stronger node and built a better following in opposition to the Bush Administration before the proliferation of Twitter and Facebook, so Noah may be struggling more, because focus is more diffuse, and is just harder to sell under a liberal presidency than not.
Posted by: McDevite | January 27, 2016 at 01:22 PM
I agree with that. I think he's a better comedian than Stewart, and his "lost in America" schtick hasn't gotten old yet.
But that's analyzing; all I can say is that I'm laughing more, but the interviews really are terrible and I note them dodging the most topical material.
Posted by: Noel Maurer | January 27, 2016 at 04:22 PM