« Observatorio argentino 23: Secret treaties, 21st-century Argentine style, are very boring | Main | About that website ... »

November 18, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

+1, I'm primed to look for contingency and the very first thing I noticed was "purchases risk".

I wonder if this doesn't tie into the whole discussion currently going on about the Larry Summers talk and the various comments and counter-comments around it? Krugman notes persistently low inflation over the last 25 years or so, but also notes multiple bubbles. What are "bubbles" if not inflation concentrated in specific sectors? Housing starts to get unreasonably pricey, which drives excess production and rising prices for both the inputs and specialized labor surrounding construction, which screws up the price signal in various labor markets (too many construction jobs, mortgage originators), etc. The Fed is primed to take away the punchbowl when inflation spills over into the entire economy, but it has been willing to let it happen in specific sectors on the theory that you can't really tell what's a bubble and what isn't.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)