« De tocho morocho, dice el IMF a la madre patria | Main | Hot tea is unpleasant in the Miami heat, I think »

May 24, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I'm really not sure who you're arguing against, or what. If you acknowledge that it's a small part of the U.S. energy mix, then maybe there's reason to be concerned about whether the cost/benefit plays out. Maybe you put a high value on not having oil wells off Coney Island or Sea Side.

More seriously, one realize has to wonder why it was a great idea to start issuing waivers on environmental regulation willy-nilly.

The tone on MSNBC was too much for us. We're against that. Blame and punishment is one thing; Luddism and anger over an inability to produce miracles once the damage is done is quite another.

Perhaps I should have been clearer.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)