« This movie looks really bad | Main | Chillin’ like it was 1999 »

September 16, 2009


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Crappy environment? I'm going to guess that there's a fair amount of technically challenging work that's being done in what amounts to the middle of nowhere. The cost associated with getting the required talent and equipment in place is the sort of thing that might reasonably be underestimated, at least the first few times.

Idiosyncratic issues with each deveopment? (Or, crappy scale?) These tend to be relatively small projects still, right? A lot of development work can be contracted out to experienced specialist firms in other areas of oil drilling. There are loads of specialist deep sea drilling, shallow sea drilling, supply and logitistics companies operating in, say, the Gulf. Not only are the technical issues better understood, but the scale exists for specialists to operate profitably within the niches those technical issues create. I suspect everything being done with regards to the oil sands is de novo and custom built.

Ordinarily I would have said unexpected opportunistic rent-seeking by the locals... but there aren't any locals out there, are there?

For real overruns, there's always the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood to beat most comers -- originally costed at between £10- and £40M, the final bill came in at £414M (three years late on a two year project, to add insult to injury).

However, that says nothing about Alberta.

Did the oil companies want to run up a big operating loss to write off against profits?

The companies invloved tend to be JVs of bigger players, so I think there'd be a coordination issue as far as purposefully running up losses.

I'd also guess that the reasons for cost overruns in government projects in well-developed areas like, say, Boston tend to be different from what we're seeing in Alberta.

I know for a fact that labour supply has been a huge issue, not only in the oil fields but in Alberta as a whole. Workers at Tim Horton's coffee shops get paid $C15 an hour and scholarships to keep them from moving north, while migrants have come from all over central and eastern Canada. Wages are terrifically high, such that professionals can drop everything, go west, and come back richer than they would have otherwise.

How much richer?

From the anecdotal stories I've heard, tens of thousands of dollars richer.

The living standards are atrocious, of course, a dozen or so people crowded into a bungalow, but still, it's the standard tradeoff made by migrant workers everywhere. Atlantic Canadians are used to this kind of thing, but it's very unusual for Ontarians, whose province was usually the _destination_ for this class of people.

The comments to this entry are closed.