This is not helpful. It isn't that I'd expect thoughtful foreign policy analysis from Senator DeMint, but holding up our ambassador to Brazil in order to try to get the Administration to oppose the policy supported by entire rest of the hemisphere does nothing for anybody. Is there really a domestic return to this sort of posturing?
In my own fair and balanced way, however, I'll add that the absolutist stance recently taken by the Brazilian foreign minister is also not helpful. Like Senator DeMint's calls to have the U.S. back Micheletti, Celso Amorim's demand for “the unconditional return of the deposed Honduran to the presidency” is also aimed at some domestic audience. I suppose that the Brazilians should enjoy their ability to make such statements unworried about their international consequences; with the country's relative power growing, and the U.S. slowly withdrawing, they won't have that freedom much longer.
The Honduran government just expelled Venezuelan diplomats. It's sort of funny, in a way, since those diplomats didn't recognize the Honduran government to begin with. That, at least, is comic opera. What is more worrisome is the recent statement by said diplomats that they aren't leaving. Meanwhile, Zelaya is in Nicaragua making vague threats and stirring up some anger on the part of that country's beleaguered opposition.
I think the pressure is going to get ratcheted up. One possible sanction that the U.S. could quietly impose without tanking the Honduran economy would be to suspend business and tourist visas. Of course, what we don't know is whether the block to a compromise is on Micheletti's side or on Zelaya's ... and without that knowledge, it's hard to figure out the best way forward.
UPDATE, JULY 22: The recent compromise talks have collapsed. The Supreme Court appears to have rejected a proposal put forward by a representative of the Micheletti government. Then again, the attorney-general has issued a 16-page indictment against Manuel “Mel” Zelaya. Congress has approved a budget of $5.9 billion, eight percent lower than last year. It counts on $554 million in foreign financing; it isn't clear how the sanctions on Honduras by multilateral lending institutions will affect that, since they seem to be counting on around $100 million in such financing, and access to other private funds is often contingent on lending by the multilaterals.
For those of you who want a run-down on what to read: El Heraldo is the conservative newspaper. Consider these two simultaneous headlines: “People’s bloc opts for neighborhood protests” versus “Today, great march for patriotism and valor.” No points for guessing which favors what. La Tribuna is a little more fair and balanced, although it is also fairly conservative by American standards. El Tiempo is okay, I'm not thrilled by its coverage.
Thoughts on Zelaya's 20-truck convoy to the border, complete with Venezuelan driver? It'll all end in tears, I'm guessing....
Posted by: Bernard Guerrero | July 24, 2009 at 05:06 PM
So far, so good, though. I'm not always right, but it does indeed seem as though Zelaya was posturing. All we need now is for the Supreme Court to ratify the accord; which seems to be only remaining stumbling block.
Here's the text of the accord.
Posted by: Noel Maurer | July 26, 2009 at 02:12 AM
A lot of it does sound like jockeying for position, from both sides. I found the military communique interesting. That said, any chance that events get beyond the main actors?
"In the meantime, however, thousands of troops had been deployed to tighten security along the border to prevent Mr. Zelaya from returning. And thousands of his supporters defied government curfews and military roadblocks, by abandoning their cars and hiking for hours to reach the remote border post to see him."
Posted by: Bernard Guerrero | July 27, 2009 at 07:28 AM