In the spring a young man's fancy lightly turns to thoughts of the general election.
Like many, I have wondered, why does she do it? Unlike many, I am loth to think ill of her. Perhaps I am too charitable, perhaps I am too quick to forgive and forget, or perhaps I can in fact think of a good and legitimate reason for her to keep running. Which would be, in light of Wright, that she honestly believes that the black guy Obama can't win in the fall.
Well, the state polls are now in. Of course, it's early. The electorate hasn't gotten much of a critical look at Mr. McCain yet, so they're mostly biased in his favor. In addition, much depends on your theory of scandals. If you believe that the big impact is immediate, then Obama is over the hump. If, on the other hand, you believe that endless flogging of the Reverend Wright's intemperate comments only slowly alters perceptions, then he is not. But those are caveats, and anyway, with the Democratic race still not over, the data we have are the data we have.
And here's what they show:
The blue states lean Democratic under both candidates. The red states lean Republican under both candidates. The white states are toss-ups under both candidates.
The interesting states are the brown and purple ones. The brown states lean to the GOP under Obama, but Hillary pulls them into the Democratic camp. The purple ones, meanwhile lean to the GOP under Hillary (except Nevada, which is a toss-up), but lean Democratic if Obama gets the nod.
Similarly, although the map doesn't show it, McCain's support drops precipitously in Georgia, Mississippi, Montana, and North Carolina if Obama is the candidate, although not by enough to put the Democrats ahead.
So this is the current state of the race. Does it match your instincts? If not, why not? And what are the implications for the "electability" argument?
Recent Comments